This is the last post in my analysis and commentary on Bruce Bartlett’s testimony to the Senate Budget Committee. There’s one very significant issue left to discuss, and that is the issue of fiscal gap and generational accounting and whether it should be institutionalized in legislation. I’ll begin this post with that discussion and then end the series with my overall evaluation of his effort.
-
Search It!
-
Recent Entries
- Standard Money Theory and the Coronavirus
- Manhattan Project to prevent Hyper-Inflation
- STANDARD MONEY THEORY
- MMT is a Political Problem: Part 2
- MMT is a Political Problem: Part 1
- GW, CC, and MM
- 21st Century Machiavellians 3: The Clash of Machiavellians, the Billionaire Class, and an Anti-Machiavellian Politics
- 21st Century Machiavellians 2: The Gaslighting, Neo-Fascist Gangsters of the Republican Party
- 21st Century Machiavellians 1.2: Elites View the Democratic Party as a Containment Vessel for Popular Discontent
- STATEMENT: House Budget Committee, “Reexamining the economic costs of debt”, Nov 20, 2019
-
Links
- 3Spoken
- Angry Bear
- Bill Mitchell – billy blog
- Bureau of Economic Analysis
- Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
- Central Bank Research Hub, BIS
- Corrente
- Counterpunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names
- Credit Writedowns
- Dollar Monopoly
- Econbrowser
- Economic Indicators Calendar
- Economix
- FedViews
- Felix Salmon
- Financial Market Indices
- Fiscal Sustainability Teach-In
- FRASER
- Government Data
- heteconomist.com
- How Economic Inequality Harms Societies
- interfluidity
- International Post Keynesian Conference
- Is the US Likely to Experience a Double-Dip Recession?
- It's the People's Money
- Izabella Kaminska @ FT Alphaville
- Mecpoc Monetary Economics Primer
- Michael Hudson
- Mike Norman Economics
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
- MMT Bulgaria
- MMT In Canada
- Modern Money Mechanics
- Naked Capitalism
- NBER Information on Recessions and Recoveries
- NBER: Economic Indicators and Releases
- Nouriel Roubini's Global EconoMonitor
- Paul Kedrosky's Infectious Greed
- Paul Krugman
- Recovery.gov
- rete mmt
- The 7 Deadly Innocent Frauds of Economic Policy by Warren Mosler
- The Big Picture
- The Center of the Universe
- The Centre of Full Employment and Equity
- The Congressional Budget Office
- The Financial Crisis Timeline
- The Future of Finance
- The Global Macro Edge
- The Trap – Parts 1, 2 & 3, by Adam Curtis (via Internet Archive)
- Un Cafelito a las Once
- USA Spending
- Winterspeak

John Locke is the “father” of property rights theory, and continues to be referenced in defense of private property. In the second volume of his Two Treatises of Government, Locke specified the conditions that must be satisfied in order for property to be deemed legitimate. Initially, any property taken from “the commons” (public or collective property) had to be based on one’s labor that was expended to improve that property. (While Locke focused on landed property, his argument applies more generally.)