Author Archives: Joe Firestone

Real Fiscal Responsibility, Vol. II: The Peterson Network, Inequality, and the Failure of Neoliberalism

Posted on February 3, 2016 | 1 comment

Real Fiscal Responsibility, Vol II Book Cover

This is how the mission of the President’s National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform was defined by the White House on February 18, 2010:

The Commission is charged with identifying policies to improve the fiscal situation in the medium term and to achieve fiscal sustainability over the long run. Specifically, the Commission shall propose recommendations designed to balance the budget, excluding interest payments on the debt, by 2015. This result is projected to stabilize the debt-to-GDP ratio at an acceptable level once the economy recovers. The magnitude and timing of the policy measures necessary to achieve this goal are subject to considerable uncertainty and will depend on the evolution of the economy. In addition, the Commission shall propose recommendations that meaningfully improve the long-run fiscal outlook, including changes to address the growth of entitlement spending and the gap between the projected revenues and expenditures of the Federal Government.

Continue reading →

1 Comment

Posted in Joe Firestone

Tagged austerity, inequality, MMT, Modern Monetary Theory, neoliberalism, The New Deal, The Peter G. Peterson Foundation, The Peterson Network

For US Democracy: There Is Only One Choice

Posted on February 3, 2016 | 8 comments

Real Fiscal Respomsibility, Vol. II Cover

We need big, big changes in the United States. Many of them will require the Federal Government to spend unprecedented amounts, including deficit spending to enable us to solve problems that have languished, creating needs, for many, many years.

How can we get these changes legislated through a political system that has been increasingly less responsive to most people over the past four decades. There’s only one way that will work without revolution.

We need a movement for change powerful enough to replace the present establishment of House and Senate legislators and presidents wanting to preserve their way of looking at how to do things, with another group that has concluded that change is desperately needed and must be accomplished come what may, whatever the cost in long established customs and traditions in both Houses of Congress and among the vested political and communications elites in the Washington, DC/New York “village.” But not just any changes will do. Continue reading →

8 Comments

Posted in Joe Firestone

Tagged austerity, budget surpluses, Hillary Clinton Bernie Sanders, neoliberalism, Peter G. Peterson, President Bill Clinton, REAL fiscal responsibility, Real fiscal sustainability

An Excerpt from Real Fiscal Responsibility, Vol I: the Progressive Give-up Formula

Posted on December 17, 2015 | 3 comments

Below is an excerpt from my most recent e-book: Real Fiscal Responsibility, Vol. I: The Progressive Give-up Formula. The book is volume I of II critiquing austerity politics at the Federal level in the United States. It exposes its fallacies, its closed-mindedness and futility, and especially its reliance on wrong-headed conceptions of fiscal sustainability and fiscal responsibility. Continue reading →

3 Comments

Posted in Joe Firestone

Tagged austerity, auterians, debt-to-GDP ratio, deficit reduction, MMT, Progressive Give-up Formula, REAL fiscal responsibility

Some Platinum Coin Objections from the Mainstream: Part V

Posted on November 20, 2015 | Comments Off

This is Part V, and the conclusion, of the series providing my reply to Philip Wallach’s reply to my evaluation of his views on the platinum coin proposal and other options for settling debt ceiling conflicts. In Part I I discussed some preliminary mis-characterizations of what I said and, more importantly, why the commonly recognized fiscal policy rule that, at least over a number of years, government revenues ought to match government spending is fiscally unsustainable and fiscally irresponsible in light of deductions from the Sectoral Financial Balances (SFB) model. Continue reading →

Comments Off on Some Platinum Coin Objections from the Mainstream: Part V

Posted in Joe Firestone

Tagged $100 Trillion coin, Brookings Institution, Conservatism, consols, debt ceiling crisis, debt limit, fiscal myths, Mike Castle, Philip A. Wallach, Philip N. Diehl, platinum coin seigniorage, Political legitimacy, Trillion Dollar Coin, weirdness

Some Platinum Coin Objections from the Mainstream: Part IV

Posted on November 14, 2015 | 5 comments

This is Part IV of my reply to Philip Wallach’s reply to my evaluation of his views on the platinum coin proposal and other options for settling debt ceiling conflicts. In Part I I discussed some preliminary mis-characterizations of what I said and, more importantly, why the commonly recognized fiscal policy rule that, at least over a number of years, government revenues ought to match government spending is fiscally unsustainable and fiscally irresponsible in light of deductions from the Sectoral Financial Balances (SFB) model.

In Part II I continued with a discussion of political legitimacy and usurpation issues and then covered some legal objections to using the $100 T platinum coin option related to the “intent” of the coin law. In Part III I discussed a legal objection based on Wallach’s view of the intent of the coin law, which quickly morphed into a political objection about the desirability of mutual respect and comity among the three branches of government, as well as the threat to political legitimacy arising from the judgment that the platinum coin option is really “weird.”

In this, Part IV, I’ll continue discussing the “weirdness” objection, and also cover Wallach’s views on Inflation and hyper-inflation, and Modern Money Theory. Continue reading →

5 Comments

Posted in Joe Firestone

Tagged $100 Trillion coin, 14th Amendment, Brookings Institution, Conservatism, debt ceiling crisis, debt limit, fiscal myths, Mike Castle, Philip A. Wallach, Philip N. Diehl, platinum coin seigniorage, Political legitimacy, Trillion Dollar Coin, weirdness

Some Platinum Coin Objections from the Mainstream: Part III

Posted on November 13, 2015 | 13 comments

This is Part III of my lengthy reply to Philip Wallach’s reply to my evaluation of his views on the platinum coin proposal and other options for settling debt ceiling conflicts. In Part I I discussed some preliminary mis-characterizations of what I said and, more importantly, why the commonly recognized fiscal policy rule that, at least over a number of years, government revenues ought to match government spending is fiscally unsustainable and fiscally irresponsible in light of deductions from the Sectoral Financial Balances (SFB) model. In Part II I continued with a discussion of political legitimacy and usurpation issues and then covered some legal objections to using the $100 T platinum coin option related to the “intent” of the coin law.

In this installment I’ll continue with more discussion of political objections. Continue reading →

13 Comments

Posted in Joe Firestone

Tagged $100 Trillion coin, 14th Amendment, beowulf, Brookings Institution, Carlos Mucha, Conservatism, debt ceiling crisis, debt limit, fiscal myths, Mike Castle, Philip A. Wallach, Philip N. Diehl, platinum coin seigniorage, Trillion Dollar Coin

Some Platinum Coin Objections from the Mainstream: Part II

Posted on November 11, 2015 | 17 comments

I began a lengthy critical reply to Philip Wallach’s reply to my earlier analysis of his paper in Part I of this series. There I covered some preliminary mis-characterizations of what I said and, more importantly, why the commonly recognized fiscal policy rule that, at least over a number of years, government revenues ought to match government spending is fiscally unsustainable and fiscally irresponsible in light of deductions from the Sectoral Financial Balances (SFB) model. In this Part II, I’ll cover some conjectures about political legitimacy Wallach offers about the consequences of minting a $100 T, some legal legitimacy issues, and some additional political legitimacy issues. Continue reading →

17 Comments

Posted in Joe Firestone

Some Platinum Coin Objections from the Mainstream: Part I

Posted on November 11, 2015 | 10 comments

As I was working my way through the series of posts beginning with this one, news was announced that Republican and Democratic Party leaders in Congress, along with the President had come to agreement on the terms of ending the debt ceiling standoff in the context of a new budget deal. Their agreement provides for suspension of the debt ceiling until March of 2017; so the immediate need to turn to unusual solutions to a pending debt ceiling crisis is now gone, and, along with it, crisis-driven discussions about the platinum coin option.

Nevertheless, even though the immediate reason motivating renewed discussions of the platinum coin option is now gone, I still have some unfinished business dealing with the issues surrounding it. Late last week I replied to a paper from Philip Wallach of The Brookings Institution with a post at Naked Capitalism, as well as a number of other sites in the blogosphere. Now, Wallach has replied to my post, which mostly presents new arguments not in his original paper.

These are important to answer for the record, since platinum coin options and debt ceiling issues are likely to return again in the future, especially if we still have divided government in 2017, a very good possibility, I think. Answering them is also important, however, because they are the kinds of arguments that will be offered by the mainstream neoliberals against using the $100 T platinum coin, as well as the trillion dollar version. This series, of which this post is Part I, will present a detailed reply to Wallach’s new paper. Continue reading →

10 Comments

Posted in Joe Firestone

Tagged $100 Trillion coin, 14th Amendment, Brookings Institution, Conservatism, debt ceiling crisis, debt limit, fiscal myths, Philip A. Wallach, platinum coin seigniorage, sectoral financial balances model, SFB model, Trillion Dollar Coin

Who Needs Balanced Trade? Who Needs Balance Budgets: A New Book on Trade and Fiscal Policy

Posted on October 29, 2015 | 3 comments

The intensity of the conflict over the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) has died down since last June, after the Administration won its victory in getting Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) through Congress. During the Intervening months, the efforts of the Special Trade Representative (STR) to complete TPP negotiations have continued. At the end of June, the goal was to complete negotiations by August so that the Administration could send the Agreement to Congress in enough time to start the clock on the 90-day countdown period Congress has to vote on an agreement negotiated under the TPA, and to schedule a ratification vote on it before the end of 2015.

Continue reading →

3 Comments

Posted in Joe Firestone

Tagged A Holistic Approach to Trade and Fiscal Policy, Balanced Budget Fiscal Policy, balanced trade, Budgeting for Public Purpose Fiscal Policy, Deficit Neutrality in the Long Run Fiscal Policy, fair trade, free trade, Impact Assessment for Trade Policy, MMT, modern money theory, public purpose, TISA, TPP, Trade for Public Purpose, TTIP

Fiscal Myths of Campaign 2016: A New Kindle e-Book

Posted on October 23, 2015 | 1 comment

Most of the world, and most notably the United States, is in the grip of fiscal myths fostered by the ideology of neoliberalism. There is virtual unanimity across the major political parties in the United States in accepting the viewpoint of neoliberalism, and the fiscal myths associated with it.

This book is about these myths, the arguments showing that they are, indeed, myths, and the truths that can counter them. It is about Campaign 2016, and some of its issues, because the fiscal myths will certainly be used in the Campaign; since, for the first time in a very long time, there is a major party candidate running, who, because he advocates for a very broad agenda and for fighting inequality, will, sooner or later, find that some, and perhaps a large number, of fiscal myths are being directed at him by his opponents and their supporters, who want to persuade voters that his agenda is “fiscally irresponsible.”

Continue reading →