Wouldn’t it be great if America had a fiat-money system?


Think of how many of our seemingly intractable local and national problems could be solved if only America had its own sovereign fiat-money system! Unfortunately, most Americans can’t even think about that question because they’ve never heard a proper explanation of what “fiat-money” actually is. Here, then, is quick solution to that problem:

How an American fiat-money system would work (in eight easy steps):

  1. The sovereign U.S. government declares that every citizen and business must, on a regular and recurring basis, pay taxes to the government (or incur a harsh penalty).
  2. The government next declares that the only thing it will accept as a tax payment is a particular kind of “fiat-money” which only the government, itself, shall have the right to issue (which is why it’s called “fiat-money”).
  3. After these declarations, U.S. citizens and businesses find themselves, instantaneously, with a strong desire to acquire the government’s fiat-money to avoid the harsh penalties of being tax delinquent.
  4. In order to satisfy this desire, the government then exercises its declared right and issues the fiat-money—either electronically or with a printing press—and then spends the fiat-money into the private economy so the citizens and businesses can acquire it.
  5. The sovereign government can spend its created fiat-money into the private economy in three ways:
    1. It can directly purchase goods and services from the U.S. citizens and businesses. The government could, for example, purchase the services of the citizens to build a highway, or a bridge—or it could pay the citizens to teach children to read.
    2. The government can mail a check, or electronically deposit fiat-money directly into the bank accounts of citizens who, because of disability or old-age, are unable to work to obtain the fiat-money they need.
    3. The government can direct its central bank (which manages the creation of the fiat-money) to automatically, at the end of each business day, issue and make available to the private banking industry whatever new fiat-money is necessary to monetize the profits private industry has generated during that business day.
  6. After it has spent enough of its fiat-money into the private economy, the government then makes good on its declared intent: it collects taxes from the citizens and businesses. Now they know the government means business, and will continue to want to earn the fiat-money it issues so they can pay their taxes next time around as well.
  7. The difference between the amount of fiat-money the government issues and spends and the amount of fiat-money it collects in taxes would be called the “Citizen’s Net Gain” (CNG)—because it is the amount of fiat-money the citizens get to keep after they’ve paid their taxes.
  8. If the citizens and businesses begin to acquire more CNG fiat-money than they know what to do with, that could cause the price of everything in the private economy to go up—inflation—which, if not controlled, is undesirable and destabilizing. The sovereign government can control this inflation by a combination of three strategies:
    1. It can increase the amount of fiat-money it collects in taxes, thus draining more of the excess CNG out of the economy.
    2. The government can create special interest-bearing savings accounts which the citizens and businesses can put their excess CNG into, thus removing a large quantity of fiat-money from chasing goods and services, and replacing it with a much smaller quantity of fiat-money (the interest payments on the savings accounts).
    3. The government can direct its central bank to discourage the borrowing of money through the banking industry, which will reduce the amount of private sector profits needing to be monetized.

That’s it. Those eight steps would be the basic workings of an American fiat-money system.

Now that it’s been properly explained, just imagine for a moment what this fiat-money system is able to do. If you’re a business, the system can create fiat-money, as needed, to monetize your profits. If you’re a citizen, the system can create fiat-money to pay you to provide all kinds of useful goods and services to your local community. If you’re a politician, you can propose the government should undertake the accomplishment of some grand and important task—such as providing every citizen with a free and complete education, or providing every citizen with free health-maintenance—without having to explain “how you’re going to pay for it,” because issuing and spending fiat-money for those kinds of things is what the sovereign government is supposed to do in order for the fiat-money system to properly work. It really does send tingles of exciting possibilities up and down your spine, doesn’t it?

But now let’s stop day-dreaming. Let’s wake-up to the hard-nosed reality that the American fiat-money system we’ve just imagined is…—wait a minute! It’s the American fiat-money system we already have! The only difference between the money system we’ve imagined and the one we are actually using is the terminology we apply to it. We call the government’s particular fiat-money “U.S. dollars.” We call the “Citizen’s Net Gain” our federal budget “deficit.” We call the savings accounts the government makes available to citizens and businesses “Treasury bonds”—and we imagine the government is “borrowing” the dollars being deposited in them. Finally, we call the amount of fiat-money that has been sequestered in the Treasury bond savings accounts our “national debt.” Other than these minor differences in terminology, our American money system is exactly the fiat-money we’ve just imagined.

The terminology differences, however, have an extraordinary impact: They make it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to rationally use our fiat-money system to accomplish the things we need accomplishing. It’s like trying to drive a car with all the pedals mislabeled and the steering gearbox turned upside down: the accelerator is called the “brake,” the “brake” is called the accelerator, if you turn the steering wheel counter clock-wise, the car veers to the right, if you push the gear shift to “D,” the car shoots backward. And meanwhile, the backseat is filled with car-experts and pundits explaining why all the misleading labels are correct, and how everything is supposed to work in the confusing, dysfunctional way that it does.

To restate my opening question, then: Wouldn’t it be great if we had an American fiat-money system that our politicians and economic pundits actually knew how to drive?

13 responses to “Wouldn’t it be great if America had a fiat-money system?

  1. LIES ! Private banks of the federal reserve counterfeit all our money and have since 1913…unless you slept through the last 100 years… It actually started with Hamilton “borrowing gold to start a proper (national) bank” nonsense if you bother to check the Yale writings. Let’s start with 5c above: “making available” money to private banks, as in “loans” ? You neglect that right off, which would have to be the case or THEY would be guilty (as they now are) of counterfeiting. Public money must be generated without debt, by government as sovereign, legal tender (also fail to mention the term) for even part of what you speak of. Also, what of the so-called ‘national debt’ and GDP/GNP relationship to your plan ? True, you mention inflation, but not deflation, both being avoided to keep the currency valuation as constant as possible that the ‘fed’ has totally failed at. You also fail to mention the basis for such a new system or backing, which since Nixon took us off gold in ’71 (thankfully), has been actually not the touted “petro-dollar” garbage, but LABOR…as in TAXES, and we can’t even cover the interests very well on that as we allowed our debt to be bought by too many monied, world types… so American labor is on the hook to the rest of the world’s richest as in the Panama and now the “Paradise” papers…including Putin, etal. Besides foreign invasions of all kinds, including monetary, we presently allow investment in foreign lands.. such that our people go without jobs and the welfare roles swell and the only ones left can only find employment in the military…..the plan all along, after which deployments, these people are just discarded in too many cases, being homeless, serf-soldiers of the MIC in our developing fascist states of America that the founding fathers would be totally ashamed of. The topic is too large to develop well here, so in the near future, a book will be the more likely venue for this writer.

  2. William Beyer

    Not the “national debt.” Let’s call it shareholder equity.

  3. I’m glad you got around to some logic and I salute you for publishing your thoughts.
    That said, a constructive criticism for you. Too much written about the ‘fiat dream’ prior to pointing out that it’s already the ‘dream’ we’re living. I was soon skimming and got to where you were going, but, your convictions, your truth was hard to get to. It’s one’s angst that makes for a good read.
    I’m just saying, if you’ve the wherewithal to publish this stuff, which I congratulate you for, I think you’d open blind eyes quickre with a more concise intro which will leave an uninformed reader a better chance to understand your real angle.
    Sincerely, team guy

  4. Great writing! Average person (myself included) don’t really know what “monetize” means though. Can you de-jardiniere that?

    • I meant “de-jargonize”. Sorry for the typo.

    • Ditto re “monetize.”

      • I use the phrase “monetize profits” to refer to the net aggregate result of an extremely complex set of transactions that take place every day in the Federal Reserve banking system. That net aggregate result is that the U.S. market-economy always has enough fiat-dollars to pay for the profit-making goods and services the market decides it wants to produce and consume. As it is currently being “driven,” the U.S. fiat-money system works very well to produce those for-profit goods and services. It’s other capabilities, however—directly paying for needed or even essential goods and services that don’t generate a financial profit—those capabilities are ignored or disbelieved by the backseat drivers because the dashboard labeling terminology says they aren’t possible.

  5. Andrew Anderson

    In truth, we don’t have a true fiat system since, for one glaring example, citizens are not allowed to use their Nation’s fiat except for grubby, unsafe, inconvenient physical fiat, aka “cash” but instead must work through government-privileged usury cartels who alone may have fiat checking accounts at the central bank. Why may not citizens also directly use fiat via accounts at the central bank? Hmm? Cui bono that they can’t if not the banks themselves and the most so-called creditworthy, the richer, at the expense of the poorer?

    And why must we have just one payment system, the one that must work through the banks, credit unions, etc. or not work at all? Why must the banks and other “private” depository institutions hold the economy hostage thereby?

  6. We do indeed have a fiat money system but it is used very sparingly. From the 2015 report from the US Mint:
    ” We also returned $550 million in seigniorage to the Treasury General Fund in FY 2015, more than double the amount we returned last fiscal year.”
    Quarters were the primary source of the seigniorage. They should mint a few T$ coins to beef up the seigniorage!

  7. An excellent explanation and very informative/helpful, for which thanks JD!

    I actually think that IF – and it’s a big if – people had their own complementary money system that was issued in return of acts of good citizenship (think volunteering) that your scheme would work very well.

    What do you think though?

    Kind regards, and thanks as ever, Mike.

  8. Most money is issued backed by some sort of collateral. Fiat money is helicopter money without collateral. That could be issued one time without causing inflation.